EN 15085
The European standard for welding of railway vehicles and components. Carbra works to its weld classes per joint and cites it in every disposition; citing it is not holding a certificate.
A glossary of the terms Railira's agents work with, the standards the reasoning layer cites, and the inputs a plant brings to a pilot baseline. No white papers or calculators are published yet; this page is the reference we actually have.
Retrieval is tenant-isolated and every answer carries its citation. Citing a standard is not a certification claim.
The terms that appear throughout the site.
The European standard for welding of railway vehicles and components. Carbra works to its weld classes per joint and cites it in every disposition; citing it is not holding a certificate.
The welded shell of a rail vehicle: roof, sidewalls, underframe and end walls, in steel or aluminium extrusion. Its geometry decides whether doors, glazing and the bogie interface fit later.
The running gear under a rail vehicle: frame, wheelsets, axle boxes, suspension, brakes, traction motors and gearboxes. Safety-critical, and judged at brake test and ride-quality runs.
Pressing a wheel or bearing onto an axle. The force-against-displacement curve is the record of whether the fit is right; Bogira reads it per wheelset.
Lowering the carbody onto its bogies and connecting them. The interface geometry has to be right before the lift, not discovered after it.
The exterior paint scheme and protective coating system of a rail vehicle, including anti-graffiti and anti-corrosion layers, applied to the operator's class-A standard.
The time and environmental conditions a coat needs before the next coat or the next move. Coatyx watches it and hands it to Taktos as a constraint.
The cadence a line moves at. On a long-cycle, variant-rich line, one late bogie or curing car breaks it; Taktos sequences against live readiness to hold it.
Just in sequence: kits fed to the station in the order the cars arrive. One missing harness stops the station.
The rail industry's quality management standard. Railira's genealogy and disposition records are built to be cited against it, not to claim certification to it.
Bringing a finished car to life: brake and traction tests, signaling (ETCS, ERTMS or PTC) commissioning, dynamic ride-quality runs and haul tests. Taktos schedules the slots.
The record of a car: weld records per joint, geometry scans, torque traces, coating recipe and cure, fit-out checks, marriage interface, approvals, test results and disposition.
The inputs for a baseline agreed in writing.
The pages that explain the mechanics.
How the plant-edge runtime, orchestrator, agents, twin and cloud loop fit together.
The write path, the audit record and the data governance.
What a pilot on weld and geometry, bogie torque or livery and cure would do and measure.
A stopped line rents by the minute, autonomy as a dial, hit quality and takt before the shift.
The SDK and CLI design previews.
Tiers, the comparison table and the arithmetic a plant runs.
Every Railira run is an ordered, inspectable sequence. This is run_9b4e27: Car 07 of a 4-car metro consist · shell line B · bogie shop · booth 2 · marriage station. Scenario completes in 10 steps with one approval gate. Shell geometry held inside tolerance after a twin-ranked weld sequence, one heat-input change approved by the shift weld engineer, two torque traces routed to rework before brake test, the livery cure window protected in the sequence, marriage interface inside tolerance, car released with full genealogy.
Plant Orchestrator · Pulled the work packages for car 07 from MES and PLM: aluminium extrusion shell, EN 15085 weld class per joint, control-plan geometry tolerances, bogie torque specifications, livery recipe and cure window, fit-out and marriage sequence. Locked the approved control-plan envelope for the shift.
Line-and-Logistics · Sequenced the shift against live readiness: booth 2 cure window, bogie B-14 readiness, brake-test slot at 13:40, AMR fleet state and kit inventory. The plan moves car 07 marriage behind car 06 to keep the cure window and the test slot.
Train Twin · Simulated 18 candidate weld sequences for the roof-to-sidewall joints on the as-built twin and ranked them on predicted distortion, door-aperture geometry and heat input. Sequence #6 keeps the aperture inside tolerance with 2% less heat input than the standing sequence.
Weld-and-Structure · Recommended sequence #6 and the matching clamping plan to the shell line. Seam vision and laser-tracker geometry confirmed the roof-to-sidewall joints inside the control-plan tolerance on the first four seams.
Plant Orchestrator · Sequence #6 lowers heat input on the roof joints 2% below the standing weld procedure. Heat-input changes stay with a named engineer, so the step was held for the shift weld engineer and approved at 06:12:44 with the twin evidence attached.
Bogie-and-Running-Gear · Press-fit curves and torque traces on bogie B-14 read at the station. Two traction-motor mounting traces fell outside the expected profile and were routed to rework before brake test; the remaining safety-critical joints verified to spec.
Coat-and-Livery · Booth 2 humidity and temperature, film thickness and flash time watched through the livery pass. One masking misalignment on the door band flagged by booth vision before the second coat; the cure window held and handed to the sequence as a hard constraint.
Marry-and-Couple · Carbody and bogie scans compared against target interface geometry before the lift. Fit-out readiness confirmed by Fitout-and-Interior for doors and glazing. Marriage guided inside tolerance; coupler and gangway checks verified and written to the twin.
Quality-and-Anomaly · Weld and coating vision, in-line metrology, torque, wiring continuity and brake-test results fused at the edge across the car. Every finding localised to station, work package and shift, with the two torque reworks and the masking flag already closed.
Conformance · Car 07 released: genealogy written (weld records per joint, geometry scans, torque traces, coating recipe and cure record, fit-out checks, marriage interface, approvals, test results) and dispositioned against the control plan and IRIS / ISO/TS 22163 criteria with cited evidence for the quality engineer's sign-off.
A rolling-stock plant does not go from manual to unattended in one step. Railira makes the level explicit, auditable and reversible at any time. The first release runs shadow mode, then assist mode, then bounded autonomy on low-risk actions. Weld parameters, schedule release and car release stay with named humans until acceptance is earned.
| Level | What the agent does | What the human does | Where it sits in a pilot |
|---|---|---|---|
| L1 · Shadow | Reads weld, metrology, torque, coating, wiring, test, robot and MES signals; predicts and recommends; writes nothing | Runs the line as today; compares predictions to inspection and engineer outcomes | Shadow mode; baseline measured from the plant's own records |
| L2 · Assist | Proposes weld-sequence, geometry, coating, torque and sequencing moves with evidence, confidence, envelope and rollback path | Approves each move in the review console | Assist mode; accuracy and ROI proven against the baseline |
| L3 · Bounded | Executes pre-approved low-risk actions: inspection routing, rework priority, kit feeding, robot path variants and parameter adjustments inside approved bounds | Approves heat-input and weld-sequence changes, schedule release and car release | Graduated autonomy, after audited accuracy and ROI and safety gates |
| L4 · Scaled | Supervised weld-parameter adaptation inside pre-approved control-plan envelopes, across lines and plants | Sets the envelope; reviews the shift record and the evaluation results | Planned; after IRIS, plant and OEM acceptance is earned |
A seam is welded in seconds and a booth cannot wait for the cloud. Perception has to be local, deterministic and fast, so Railira runs GPU inference at the plant edge and keeps training, simulation and optimisation in the cloud or on-prem.
8 to 32 cameras per process area plus metrology, torque, thermal, robot and booth-instrument streams fused at the plant edge. Sub-50 ms weld and seam alerts and sub-150 ms coating and metrology prompts are the design targets. Jetson Thor is planned for higher sensor density.
Weld-defect, geometry-risk, coating-risk, point-cloud and takt-risk models served at the plant edge with per-model versioning and rollback, routed by latency, tenant, sensitivity and cost.
Weld and coating defect vision, metrology classification, control-plan reasoning and FEA-surrogate models fine-tuned on plant data and engineer corrections. 100 to 500 GPU-hours per plant during onboarding is the design target; dedicated capacity is planned.
As-built carbody, coating, marriage and line-flow twin. Weld distortion, geometry build-up, robot reach, coating coverage and layout simulated before the shift. GPU FEA and point-cloud metrology are the workloads; OVX scale is planned.
Rare weld defects, coating contamination, geometry deviations, occluded seams and torque-escape cases generated and validated against real inspection distributions before promotion. Planned.
Line sequencing, JIS feeding, AMR and AGV routing, buffer management and commissioning-slot scheduling against live readiness.
Robotic weld, coating and assembly cells and AMR or AGV flow; path variants validated in simulation before release to the floor.
Telemetry features from weld parameters, metrology, coating readings, torque, non-conformance and takt history for retraining, drift detection and network analytics.
The questions plant directors, body and coating engineers and quality leads ask in the first meeting.
Only within an explicit tool allow-list with per-tool rate and magnitude limits, inside the approved control-plan envelope, and only at the autonomy level your plant has set. Design partners start in shadow mode, where Railira writes nothing. Heat-input and weld-sequence changes, schedule release and car release stay with a named approver.
Control returns to the robot, PLC or station's last known-good state. Railira is a supervisory layer on top of the controllers, safety systems and interlocks you already run, never a replacement for them, so an outage degrades the line to its current way of running, not to a stop.
Recommendations start from the control plan, the work instructions and the twin in the first weeks. Weld, geometry, coating and torque prediction improve as line history and labelled outcomes accumulate per car type. Onboarding is sized at 100 to 500 GPU-hours per plant and 50,000 to 250,000 synthetic images or scan variants per program, all design targets.
Only if you choose cloud training. Designs, control plans, program data, process models and quality records are isolated per tenant and never used to train another customer's models. Fully on-prem deployment at the plant edge is available for regulated plants, and cross-plant learning is planned and waits on data-rights agreements.
You are, the same as with any control strategy, which is why every write is policy-checked, bounded, logged and reversible, and why anything above your risk threshold waits for a named approver. The audit log records the request, the evidence, the envelope applied and the human decision.
A paid pilot on one process or line area, scoped to a single wedge with a success metric written into the order form: weld or coating rework reduction, geometry escapes, torque escapes, line stoppage minutes or first-time-through. It starts in shadow mode against a baseline from your own records, moves to assist mode when the engineer is satisfied, and expands only after the number moves.
Start with one carbody, bogie, coating, fit-out or sequencing process and one measurable baseline. A paid pilot on weld and geometry, torque assurance, livery defects or line sequencing shows the number before you commit further.
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc close